Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Rules: Achiral Compounds (r,s)

How to Manipulate JSmol Structures

[Powered by Jmol 14.31.0]




While the descriptors R/S are employed in the CIP system to describe absolute configuration of tetracoordinate chiral centers, the lower case r/s descriptors are applied to the configuration of pseudoasymmetric centers.The rules for assigning these descriptors are addressed in the examples below. The 2013 update of the 1982 Cahn-Ingold-Prelog rules is located here.


Fig. 1



The trans-stereoisomer (Fig. 1), as represented in 1a, has a plane of symmetry through C1 and C4 and a two-fold axis of symmetry along the x-axis that passes through the center of the C2-C3 and C5-C6 bonds. The pseudo-asymmetric carbons C1 and C4 are equivalent owing to the two-fold axis. The configurational assignments will be the same.

At C1 the lowest priority (4) atom is hydrogen and the methyl group ranks third. But how does one chose between the chains C2-C3-C4 and C6-C5-C4 for the remaining two priorities? They are essentially mirror images of one another. Therein lies a solution!

Digraph 1b is constructed by following the path from C1 (red dot) to C2-C6 and terminating in a duplicate carbon atom (C1; red dot) that has an atomic number of six but is attached to three "phantom" atoms of atomic number zero. The same process may also proceed from C1 to C6-C2 terminating in a duplicate C1. These two chains are enantiomeric and temporary configurations (Ro/So) can be assigned to each based on the "chiral" center at C4. The lefthand C4 of 1b is assigned an Ro configuration with priorities C3-C2-C1>C5-C6-C1(duplicate)>CH3>H. Conversely, the enantiomeric righthand C4 chain is of the So configuration.

Therefore, C1 has the top two priority chains as Ro and So. Because R has priority over S, the same is true for Ro and So. The configuration of C1 is r given Ro>So>CH3>H. By symmetry C4 is also of the r-configuration. Structure 1c is a condensed version of 1b.

cis-1,4-Dimethylcyclohexane (Fig. 2) has a plane of symmetry through C1 and C4 and a two-fold axis of rotation orthogonal to the plane of the ring. Both of these pseudoasymmetric centers will have the same configuration. The only difference between digraph 2b and 1b is the stereochemistry at C1 while the Ro/So assignments remain the same. The priorities remain the same, Ro>So>CH3>H. Both C1 and C4 have the same s-configuration.

Return to Index

Fig. 2


Fig. 3



These two stereoisomers, Figs. 3 & 4, provide an interesting comparison to Figs. 1 & 2, respectively. Note that the temporary Ro/So assignments in 1-methyl-4-propylcyclohexanes are opposite those in 1,4-dimethylcyclohexanes. This is the result of a change in priorities. In digraph 3b the propyl group takes priority over the chain bearing the duplicate atom. The carbon of the terminal methyl group of the propyl chain has an atomic number of six while the terminal duplicate carbon (red dot) is attached to three atoms of atomic number zero. Therefore, the assignment of So to the lefthand center of C4 arises from the priorities C3-C2-C1>propyl>C5-C6-C1>H. The same reasoning applies to the Ro assignment in 3b as well as 4b. The C1 center of the trans-isomer (3c) is of the s-configuration while the cis-isomer (4c) has the r-configuration at C1.

The Ro/So assignments for C1 in 3d are the same as in 1b. The configuration at C4 in 3d is "r" following the priorities C3-C2-C1>C5-C6-C1>propyl>H [Ro>So>propyl>H]. The same arguments may be applied to the C4 s-configuration of the cis-isomer (Fig. 4).

The only difference between 5a and 6a is the configuration at C1. All other assignments remain the same. The priorities are Ro>So>CH3>H and C1 is of the r-configuration.The assignment at C4 in 4d is the opposite of 3d because the Ro/So assignments have been switched at C1. The priorities are Ro>So>CH3CH2CH2>H and C4 is of the s-configuration.

Return to Index

Fig. 4


Fig. 5



These trans/cis isomers of 4-methylcyclohexan-1-ol, Figs. 5 & 6 respectively, have the same temporary configurations at C4 (5b & 6b) as was observed in Figs. 1 & 2. The major difference lies in the Ro/So assignments in 5d & 6d where the priorities are OH>C3-C2-C1>C5-C6-C1>H. The assignment of C1 (5c & 6c) has priorities OH>Ro>So>H while C4 (5e & 6e) has Ro>So>CH3>H.

Return to Index

Fig. 6


Fig. 7



These trans/cis isomers have the same symmetry as Figs. 1 & 2. Thus, C1 and C3 are identical in each stereoisomer and there will be a single r/s assignment. The trans-isomer has an r-configuration at C1, and of course at C3, with priorities Cl>Ro>So>H.

Return to Index

Fig. 8


Fig. 9



trans-Decalin has the same symmetry as trans-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane (Fig. 1) and trans-1,3-dichlorocyclobutane (Fig. 7) but the analysis is not as simple as these earlier cases. A 2-fold horizontal axis of rotation exists in trans-decalin 9a. The configurations at C1 and C6 will be the same. At C1, C6 has the highest priority and the hydrogen has the lowest. How does one assign Ro/So designations to distinguish C2 from C10? A method for the determination of the configuration in 9a is not obvious. Digraph 9b is the method of choice. There are six paths from non-duplicate C1 that return to duplicate atoms C(1), all of which are attached to three atoms of atomic number zero.There is a vertical plane of symmetry that renders two of the chains in 9b enantiomeric. The left hand chain at C6 has the temporary So-configuration because C5> C7> C(1). C6 in the right hand chain has the Ro-configuration [C7> C5> C(1)]. Employing CIP rules 1 and 5, C1 has the r-configuration because C6 >Ro>So>H. Owing to axial symmetry, C6 also has the same r-configuration.<br>

cis-Decalin (10a) has the s-configuration at C1 and C6. Digraph 10b is the same as digraph 9b except that the left hand chain of 10b is now Ro and the right hand chain is So. Hence, the change in configuration. Both C1 and C6 have the same s-configuration owing to a two-fold axis of rotation orthogonal to the plane of the rings.

Return to Index


Fig. 10


Fig. 11



[2.2.1]-Bicyclohexane (11a) has two planes of symmetry. One passes through C1-C7-C4 and the other through C7 in addition to the center of the C2-C3 and C5-C6 bonds. The latter plane dictates that whatever the assignment is at C1, it will be the same at C4. Digraph 11b shows that the C7 chain has the top priority while hydrogen has the lowest priority. The left hand enantiomeric chain has the Ro-configuration; the right hand chain the So-configuration. C1 has the priorities C1>Ro>So>H. C1 has the s-configuration as does C4.


[2.1.1]-Bicyclohexane (12a) is similar to the previous example, 11a. While the hydrogen at C1 still has the lowest priority, the bold chain C1-C5-C6-C3 has the second lowest priority. A decision must be made about the chains C1-C2-C3 and C1-C4-C3. C3 in the left hand enantiomeric chain of digraph 12b is So (C2>C6>C4). The right hand chain is R o (C4>C6>C2). C1 is of the r-configuration (C4>C2>C5) as does C3.

Return to Index

Fig. 12